Historically men have spent far more time wearing gowns, robes, smocks etc than pants/trousers, indeed, a majority of the world still does; they are more comfortable so naturally Dyson would prefer dresses to the constriction of pants. There is also the question of who dressed him? In this case his mother - my father was dressed as a girl until the age of 5 and suffered immense embarassment from family photos for the rest of his life. Clothes have nothing to do with gender identity but fashion and the dictates of society do. If you are aiming for comfort wear a gown; if you want to break down gender identity then teach your child rather than dressing him/her up.

This is gender confusion. There is nothing wrong with an interest in a dress, but how a child dresses, as a child, does effect his identity. Boys wear the pants and girls wear the dresses. This seems like a lonely boy, in a somewhat of a fantasy world. Little girls play dress up. Boys play soldier.

I do not believe that a transgendered person is born that way, but it is learned. Where is the father? No male role model. It appears these boys are adopted. This child needs to have a man in his life.
So, as he grows up, he will have the option to choose the lifestyle best suited for him.

"Princess Boy" is confusing. He needs to know what a normal role is for a man, and a normal role is for a woman. Yes, we need to return to defined roles for boys and girls. They can't be both.