Picture
Dennis the peasant gets an impromptu visit from the King
Tags: class, inequality, marx/marxism, political economy, theory, weber, charasmatic authority, class conflict, class consciousness, exploitation, ideology, labor, rational-legal authority, subtitles/CC, 00 to 05 mins
Year: 1975
Length: 3:11
Access: YouTube

Summary: This hilarious clip from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, illustrates several key concepts from Marx. After Dennis (a peasant) gets a presumptuous greeting from a visitor, he states "what I object to is you automatically treating me like an inferior." The visitor responds with "well, I am King." Dennis challenges him by arguing: "How'd you get that? By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society." Marx's concept of exploitation refers to the value that comes from workers' labor, but which gets taken by the ruling class (whether it be feudal lords, kings, or capitalists) because they own the means of production. The peasant describes this process as an unfair dimension of the class system. This awareness reflects his own class consciousness, or understanding of the class system, how it affects him, and how to act in his own class interest. Another peasant notes they are part of autonomous collective, which Dennis describes as their own self-rule based on equality. When they challenge the King's authority because they didn't vote for him, the king argues he obtains his authority from "the Lady of the Lake" that gave him Excalibur and right to rule by divine providence. Dennis comically responds that "Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is not basis for government; supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony." Their competing interests reflect the class struggle in which the workers' interest (self-rule that allows them collective ownership of the means of production) are inherently in conflict with those of the ruling class (who seek to control the workers and keep the value of their labor for themselves). Finally, the notion of divine right to rule is an example of ideology, or ideas supported by the ruling class, and which legitimate the current order and obscure the oppressive class system.

I would like to thank Camilla Hayes and Andrew Hanko for recommending this clip.

Submitted By: Paul Dean

 


Comments

04/09/2012 10:21am

I've used this same clip in teaching classical sociology. But rather than Marxian concepts, I've used it to illustrate Weber's distinction between charismatic and rational-legal authority. Upon being aked how he became King, Arthur offers a classical charismatic account: He has been appointed by God, with the Lady of the Lake offering him Excalibur. This is challenged by the peasant, who offers a typical rational-legal critique: "Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony". To my mind, this is the perfect example of the distinction between the two types of authority: the anarchist peasant's critque is almost ideal-typical of (legitimations of) rational-legal authority under democracy. In a way, this is quintessential of the whole movie, which so often parodies our modern conceptions of medieval times - the countless examples of completely irrational (to our eyes) practices (whipping water with sticks in the same scene, seemingly unmotivated beating of cats).

Reply
Mattias De Vuyst
05/05/2012 4:05pm

It is definitely more illustrating Weber than Marx in my opinion. It also has some Rousseau in it as well.

Reply



Leave a Reply